The Iron-Chancellor
Monday, October 1, 2012
Following the Thirty Year’s war the
dozens of provinces that make up modern day Germany were very similar to our
own colonies during the early years of our country. The provinces were divided religiously, economically and
lacked a central authoritative power to unify them. Further there was a complete lack of infrastructure among
the provinces that made trading between them completely incredibly
inefficient. The separation among
provinces hurt the provinces economically, but this economic downfall was only
a small issue compared to the defense issues that their separation caused. The lack of unity between the provinces
made the German provinces incredibly vulnerable to foreign attackers, and it
was only a matter of time before an outside attacker took an advantage of the
opportunity.
France
finally capitalized on this opportunity, and as we will discuss in more detail
this later, this attack may have been a bitter blessing in disguise. France’s attack was led primarily
through Napoleon, however the effects of his rule would have a long lasting
impact on not only Germany but also the other major nations of Europe. Similar to our own revolution, war
forced the provinces of Germany to realize that there current system of
government was inadequate in a variety of ways. The path to unification didn’t happen overnight and was by
no means “smooth”, however it is important to remember the surrounding events
that let to the formation of what we recognize to be as Germany.
While
we have already briefly discussed several events that led to the creation and
unification of Germany, I have decided to focus on one individual who I believe
was critical to Germany’s emergence as a national superpower towards the end of
the 19th century. Otto
von Bismarck referred to by some historians, as the “Iron-Chancellor” was
appointed as the prime minister of Prussia on September 24, 1862. The Iron-Chancellor was the spark that
the German people needed to take the advancement of their nation to the next
level. As I stated earlier a previous
major flaw to the unification of the German provinces was military unity, and
the provinces often sat back on their heels as they were attacked from stronger
European countries. Bismarck
changed this tactic, and believed that if Germany wanted to strengthen it
needed to go on the offensive. This
came through a war with France that lasted till approximately 1871, and proved
to be the final necessary major historic event that led to German Unification.
Word
Count: 412
Sunday, September 9, 2012
It can be argued that we live under
the most democratic government in the world. The First Amendment of our Constitution guarantees us the
freedom to several rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to the petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” We find this clause, in
particular the “freedom of religion” clause in the First Amendment of our
Constitution, but how much are we willing to invest to secure the freedom of
these ideals? Are we willing to
send our loved ones across the world to die in the name of religious
freedom? Are we willing to
sacrifice everything to promote what we hold most dear?
I
believe that most American citizens are willing to accept that we are
culturally diverse and have a variety of religions across our nation; however
how dedicated are we to securing the protection of religious freedom? In my mind, the previous question I
listed above leaves me at a crossroads…Am I willing to die for my
religion? For multiple reasons, I
will not elaborate on the previous question, however let me tell you how much I
respect someone who is willing to risk everything in order to secure their own religious
freedom. Regardless of your
personal religious views, you cannot help but admire Martin Luther’s ability to
sacrifice everything in the pursuit of his own religious freedom. In an era dominated both secularly and
religiously by the Catholic Church, Martin Luther risked everything to defend
the things he believed in. He
stood up against the strongest governmental organizations of his times to
defend what he believed in, and for that reason I cannot help but admire Martin
Luther. You always should stand up
for what you believe in, but what are you willing to stand up against? Are you
willing to face adversity in the best interest of your beliefs? To Martin
Luther the answer to these questions was yes, and I cannot help but respect him
for defying adversity in the best interest of his beliefs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




