This is one of my best friends Dan, and while he doesn't have much to do with Marin Luther, I can't wait to go to Germany with him. I hope all you guys enjoy getting to know him, because at the end of the day he's a great guy.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
It can be argued that we live under
the most democratic government in the world. The First Amendment of our Constitution guarantees us the
freedom to several rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to the petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” We find this clause, in
particular the “freedom of religion” clause in the First Amendment of our
Constitution, but how much are we willing to invest to secure the freedom of
these ideals? Are we willing to
send our loved ones across the world to die in the name of religious
freedom? Are we willing to
sacrifice everything to promote what we hold most dear?
I
believe that most American citizens are willing to accept that we are
culturally diverse and have a variety of religions across our nation; however
how dedicated are we to securing the protection of religious freedom? In my mind, the previous question I
listed above leaves me at a crossroads…Am I willing to die for my
religion? For multiple reasons, I
will not elaborate on the previous question, however let me tell you how much I
respect someone who is willing to risk everything in order to secure their own religious
freedom. Regardless of your
personal religious views, you cannot help but admire Martin Luther’s ability to
sacrifice everything in the pursuit of his own religious freedom. In an era dominated both secularly and
religiously by the Catholic Church, Martin Luther risked everything to defend
the things he believed in. He
stood up against the strongest governmental organizations of his times to
defend what he believed in, and for that reason I cannot help but admire Martin
Luther. You always should stand up
for what you believe in, but what are you willing to stand up against? Are you
willing to face adversity in the best interest of your beliefs? To Martin
Luther the answer to these questions was yes, and I cannot help but respect him
for defying adversity in the best interest of his beliefs.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Some people typically refer to the
United States as a “melting pot” to describe the culturally diverse makeup of
our nation. While we are proud to
be culturally diverse, most Americans also take a great deal of pride in the
notion that we are “free.” “Free”
of tyranny and oppressive regimes through our ability to actively partake in
the election process through voting, our constitutional rights and a multitude
of other safeguards enacted to protect democracy. It can be argued that we are the founders of modern
democracy, however similar to Germany we are a relatively young nation (less
than 300 years) and major themes of our political and judicial systems can be
traced back through history for thousands of years.
An
entire library could be dedicated to books entailing the influence Rome had on
the formation of the Western world, but Schulze says it quite perfectly: “The
foundations of national statehood and low the customs of urban life, our
languages and ways of thinking, our alphabet and books, our architecture—in
short, the whole basis of the modern world in the West is unimaginable without
the contributions of Roman civilization and the two older civilizations
interwoven with it, those of Greece and the Hellenistic Orient (Schulze 2).” Most college students would agree that
Rome and Greece have had a significant impact on the Western world, however I
believe that we often overlook the impact that more modern nations have left on
Germany and us. Neither nation
started off as a “thoroughbred” and to put it bluntly, we were both “mutts” from
a collection of different European “states.” Our culturally diverse makeup contributed to our ability to
use European states as an example on how to or how not to mold our nation.
The
first two chapters of Schulze’s book have given me more information on the
formation of Germany that I could have ever known, but what I have appreciated
most about the book is Schulze’s ability to clearly define the historical
context leading up to the creation of Germany, and the role that certain individuals
played in that event. Further, the
first two chapters have started to indirectly point out multiple similarities between
the formation of the United States and Germany, and I look forward to finding
out more! (W/C 381)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)